The US Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from supermarket giant Wal-Mart against the $187.6m verdict in a class-action lawsuit.
Hourly employees of Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club filed the lawsuit more than a decade ago against the companies for failing to compensate for off-the-clock work, although this was mentioned in the companies’ policies.
Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club were ordered by the court to pay millions of dollars to workers employed in its Pennsylvania stores for not adhering to the state’s minimum wage laws.
The companies approached the the Supreme Court following the Pennsylvania Supreme Court verdict, which upheld the judgment in favour of the employees.
Wal-Mart was quoted by The Hill as stating that it is disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision to not review its appeal.
"While we continue to believe these claims should not be bundled together in a class-action lawsuit, we respect the court’s decision.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below formBy GlobalData
"We will now determine how we move forward in the trial court," the company added.
The company also stated that lawsuit was over a decade old and since then policies have been put in place to compensate workers for rest breaks and off-the-clock work.
"We have taken additional steps over the last decade, including enhancing our timekeeping systems and additional training, to make sure all our associates understand the importance of those policies and comply with them," the company said.